1. Sold only through iBookstore, yes. If you give it away for free, you can give it away free anywhere.

2. It'll have to be proven that Apple will enforce this. You can use iBooks Author to create your work, export it to a universal file, then sell it elsewhere - then see if Apple will do anything about it. That would require them being able to determine that your exported file contains in it some info that identifies what software was used to make it, info that you can't remove. Data that you can't remove from a universal file such as raw text or PDF? If you can't do that, you probably shouldn't be using sophisticated software to create your work.

3. Most importantly - If you were intending to sell your work through anywhere else, why would you be using iBooks Author in the first place? The entire appeal, at least its unique functionality, is that it wallows for dynamic multimedia that is exclusive to iBooks. If you were going to create fragmented versions of your content that have platform exclusives, you might as well just kick your customers in the balls. If anything, you'd be using iBooks Author intentionally to sell your content through iBookstore. If you didn't want it to be exclusive, then use a universal format and sell it through normal channels. Amazon already has a self publish platform for Kindle, and I'm sure there are others for Nook and everything else. This sentimentalization of Apple's distribution model is moot.

Common misconceptions of iBooks Author: http://venomousporridge.com/post/16178567783/common-misconceptions

It's no secret that I love phones to the point where I'm collecting them now. I have two lines of service and use them to alternate getting a new phone every year. To counter my aging iPhone 4 and replace my ancient Moto Droid, I've gotten myself the Samsung Galaxy Nexus for Verizon. So far, I love it. But loving the Galaxy Nexus is like loving a beautiful super model. She looks great, but is so thin, she's difficult to hold without feeling like she'll slip through your arms or get crushed in your manly grip. 

Even though I dual wield an iPhone 4 on AT&T and just replaced my OG Droid on VZW with the CDMA Galaxy Nexus with LTE, it was hard to break the instinct to grab my iPhone. I had to force myself to leave what I’m comfortable with and make sure I forced myself to fully explore the phone. I left my iPhone at home for a week and made the Galaxy Nexus my daily driver, solely relying on it to get me through each day. This is what I noticed.

Design

My main complaints are mostly all physical. The large surface area of the phone mixed with the thin profile makes it difficult to hold (compared to a more natural cupping of a round backside - that's right, I said it). The phone itself is slightly curved concave as a way to tout Samsung’s curved display. The large display means that with a typical "monkey grip", you're not likely to be able to reach the far corner with your thumb, making this a two handed phone for anything more than simple browsing. That makes sense for some people to naturally use a smartphone with both hands, but we all have scenarios where it would be nice if our grip hand could manage the whole phone (commuting, walking, driving where legal). That said, should you want to reach the far corner with your thumb single handedly, you turn the phone and cup the thin edge, putting it in a perilous position. The phone's design makes it dangerously smooth and subject to slipping out of your hand. I'd say get a silicone case for grip, but I'd wait until one accommodates the an extended battery should you need it. Plenty of companies will be making cases, especially with CES 2012 here. If you’re unimpressed with the bland grey color scheme, you can wait for the recently announced white version that will start shipping soon, but so far it’s just the GSM version.

Display

The 4.65" display is gorgeous, especially for a PenTile. While we've seen bad Pentile implementation on phones like the Droid RAZR, the Galaxy Nexus doesn't suffer the same woes. The high density of the pixels makes them almost indistinguishable, which makes for clear images and impressive color. It still has a slight discoloration when viewed from an angle, but you likely won’t be doing that. Something to remember is that the display will likely be the most power hungry factor in this phone, with the highest brightness attributing to upwards of 50% power usage. Definitely be smart and use auto brightness or keep it at 50% until you need it brighter.

Sound

Knowing that smart phones have become the de facto music player for many, phone maufacturers have put the headphone jack on the top so the user can still look at the screen properly (you can't rest a phone on a surface standing up if the headphone jack is on the bottom edge). I don't know about you, but I frequently put my phone in a cup holder and don't like the idea of putting it upside down just because the headphone cable is coming out the wrong way. If I had to choose a single physical detriment that could hinder a common use case for smart phones, it would be the speaker. The single (possibly stereo, can't tell) speaker is questionably located on the backside, at the bottom. The speaker isn't that strong to begin with, certainly nowhere near close to the iPhone (relative to size), but remember that something else goes along the bottom of the backside - your hand. Why on earth would designers put a single speaker grill right where your hand is? It makes it impossible to hear anything while you hold it. Even then, I've listened to music at full volume with the phone face down on my desk and felt like I was nowhere near "11". There’s really nothing that will make the speaker work any louder short of external accessories.

Battery

The phone comes with an 1850mAh battery, which seems ample enough by today's standards, but the larger display, multitasking OS and optional LTE radio usage will consume that power very quickly. On launch, Verizon was already selling a first-party 2100mAh battery for $50 and immediately discounting it to $25 by day two (so if you paid full price for it, call Verizon immediately and have them credit your account). For the price of a nice lunch, you can get yourself a bigger battery that could make the difference between your phone dying before leaving work and making it back home at the end of the day. In my conservative tests with LTE disabled, I made it 24 hours on a single charge with the extended battery. For those with LTE service available, this is a blessing and a curse. LTE can definitely nab you insane speeds, like the 17mbps down, 10 mbps up I got in the road between Ames and Des Moines. But it absolutely destroy your battery. To give you an objective power usage example, I left the phone in my hotel while I was staying in the Milwaukee area. It was 100% charged when I left, so the meter started when I unplugged it. I returned about 5 ½ hours later to see 8% power remaining. I had just powered the phone on before, so I know the only apps I had running were my widgets for GMail, Twitter, Facebook, Google+, and Google Reader. That actually is a lot to keep running, but without the display running at all, no Wi-Fi, and no calls, iit still would have been dead from virtually zero usage in 6 hours. The lesson here is that if you plan on using LTE, you better be plugged in. Some reports even say that heavy usage with LTE enabled drains the battery faster than it can charge.

OS

ICS is definitely a step up from the Froyo I'm used to and doesn't feel like it needs any mods at the moment with all its monitoring utility. You definitely need to get used to the change in manipulating apps and widgets, and of course the control buttons being "displayed" instead of being static. It's neither better or worse than iOS, and I say that as someone who uses both phones daily, which is about as objective as you can get. Would I recommend it over an iPhone? Depends on the person, of course. It's definitely the best Android phone on the market (with some very close competition from other Android devices), but you have to know that you want iPhone over Android. There's no point in telling people what they want if you are just going to tell them what you like. What I can say is that I would never question anyone buying an iPhone. They're either understand it immediately or in a short amount of time. I would question someone blindly (meaning never used a smartphone) buying any Android phone and recommend they use it before buying. Then again, anyone buying the Galaxy Nexus is buying because they know they want it, especially if they're buying unlocked for GSM (fully compatible with AT&T and T-Mobile services). For Android enthusiasts who are up on modding, CyanogenMod 9 is almost done and the available builds work on the Galaxy Nexus.

I can't speak to the call quality, since that's mostly a VZW issue and I'm probably in a bad place (AT&T has better coverage in every regard here, but that's subjective and useless in a review).

UPS has always provided shippers with a way to manage all the packages they send out. Merchants and other business absolutely need this to ensure timely delivery of their goods. But there's never been a good way for recipients to track all their incoming shipments. Collecting all your active tracking numbers and plugging them into the UPS site each time just isn't good enough if you have to do it all the time. GMail actually uses its ad space to provide an automatic link to a shipment tracking page if it detects a tracking number for UPS, FedEx and USPS. That's actually one of the types of ads that I don't mind. Plug the shipping company all you want below the link, but providing me with that helpful information makes the process much faster for me (iOS Mail app does this too).

However, this doesn't escape the major issue for someone who needs timely deliveries: signature releases. Even if the sender (ie, Amazon) doesn't require a signature for the item (ie, Spider-Man: Edge of Time), it's up to the driver's discretion to leave it or not and instead leave one of those awful slips on your door. But those paper slips are about to go the way of the dinosaurs.

UPS has finally answered my prayers with My Choice, a free (with paid extras) service that where you can register your name and address(s), so your driver will know to leave it without signature. It's a permanent whitelist. The more advanced features are rerouting packages in transit if you realize you are not at home, or having UPS hold until a certain date. This is certainly not for everyone, especially since most people live in houses and/or get deliveries without signature all the time. But for apartment dwelling folk, who try to race home or watch the online tracker show they're already too late, this is a godsend.

Just a word of warning, setting this up requires verification of identity. It doesn't require any super sensitive information, but will use your provided name, address and phone number to cross reference with any existing data they have accumulated on you. It's certainly understandable that they want to make sure no one is trying to intercept someone else's packages, but the data they have on us is scary. They will ask you to correctly answer three multiple choice questions about you, such as "What is a street you have lived on?" or "What is a phone number you have used?" Where would they get such information? From past deliveries to people with similar info, especially if you have ever shipped using UPS (eBayers, they will probably have lots of info on you). But it's not as alarming as it seems at first, just answer the questions and you're confirmed. You can now add tracking numbers to your profile for future checking and even label them so you can tell them apart.

If you regularly receive UPS shipments and paper slips are a problem for you, you should check this out. If you are concerned with "the man" knowing more about you, then I suggest not using delivery services.

UPS My Choice - warning, only link I know about is for registration. Don't know the easy way for existing members to log into their dashboard.

Because of this inherent compatibility, Audible content could always be easily transferred to iPhones to be played with the iPod app (renamed "Music" in iOS5). There was nothing wrong with this way of playing content, however, Audible wanted to bring more to the experience. It took Audible until 2010 to release an iPhone app to buy, download, and play content within the app, but that first option was short lived (more on that later).

Upon its initial release, the app was designed to rely on iOS 4's new features, such as app multitasking. It was intended to replace the playback functionality of the iPod app, which would provide achievement stats such as "hours listened" and reward with badges (which are only stored within that copy of the app, there are no global stats). The ultimate downside to this feature over a year after its release is that it Audible lacks any social networking for users to associate with other users and compare each others' libraries and reading achievements. Let's get this out of the way - Audible sucks at engaging its customers and allowing them to engage each other. For being a book retailer, it fails to grasp the notion that reading is a collective experience and isolating us slows down discovery. For God's sake, people don't have book clubs for the fun of it! You expect people to gather at their local Borders to... oh wait. Anyway, back to the main topic.

Although I'm just going off memory, I want to say that the Audible app was originally unable to play content in the background, which meant if you wanted to browse the web or use any other app that allowed background playback, the playback would immediately terminate when you closed out the app. For me, this meant launching the app, playing the book, then using some other device to do what I wanted... or I could just transfer the audiobook from my computer directly to my phone's storage and let the iPod app use it. If I wanted to earn those achievements, I could let the Audible app discover it - another feature that I never saw work until now. With October 10th's v1.7.1 release, I'm seeing a lot of the promised functions work as intended, with one exception. Audible completely removed any ability to shop their catalog within the app. I honestly can't remember the app ever having "in app" purchases, but I think Audible tried to circumvent Apple's 30% commission by launching a web browser within the app and having your buy from their mobile site. As fun as it is to shop online with a 3.5" touch screen, I would sooner just go to my computer and make the purchase, then get the content to my phone. Now it seems that pressure has forced Audible to remove even that, allowing you to create a link on your homescreen to their site.

This is where I have to say that stupid business decisions hurt consumers. Trust me, I get it, 30% is significant and Apple (as well as Google, RIM, and other mobile market platforms) should lower that to 15-20%, but if I can't easily make purchases on the spot (read: impulse purchases), then I won't make them at all. Just accept the loss in order to make more sales. More sales are more important than more revenue, because sales lead to repeat sales, which leads to more revenue. While angling iTunes as a competitor to wipe out illegal music downloading, Apple quickly realized that giving people an absurdly easy way to buy content with the push of a button will facilitate more sales. Hell, I was buying $2 comics off the Marvel app until they jacked prices up to $4 each. Whoa, stop the show. Without knowing how much of Audible's "sales" are actually made with subscription credits (has to be significant), shouldn't they be able to get away with members "purchasing" new content with their pre-paid credits within the app? It's technically a $0 transaction at that point, so Apple can have 30% of that all they want. Sure, it only benefits people with credits (Gold and Platinum subscribers), but to play Devil's Advocate, sounds like a great incentive for people to start subscribing! Now to be as fair as I described, Audible loves trying to keep its customers with incentive deals. If you try to cancel a subscription, Audible will likely offer you a discount on 3 months or a free credit. Just be prepared if you try to cancel after accepting a courtesy once or more - they make you call in to cancel. Almost makes the "I'm unhappy with Audible" reason redundant.

Here's the announcement that was emailed to Audible users the other day, hardly sympathetic from their perspective. While I praise Audible, I will always follow up with the caveats that come with their ecosystem.

We'd like to update you on a change to the Audible application that affects the way that you access the Audible mobile store. In order to comply with recent policy changes by Apple, we've removed the "Shop" link from within the app that opened your web browser and took you to the Audible mobile store.

You can still shop the mobile store, and we've created a "Shop Audible" icon that you can add to your home screen so it's always one click away. To do this, launch your web browser on your iPad, iPhone, or iPod Touch, go to mobile.audible.com, and follow the instructions to "Add to Home Screen". You can watch a quick video to walk you through the steps, or call us at (888) 283-5051 if you have any other questions.
   
    1. Click to bring up options. 2. Click on [no really, it just ends there, completely blank]   
   
That's it. The link is gone, but everything else is the same. You can still shop the store, and all your books will still be available in the app.

Thank you,
The Audible Team

He wasn't an engineer. He wasn't a designer. He was a business man. His business was to assemble the best people in the business, make them build the best product they could make and make people want it. Apple has always been a company that makes a product with a combination of form and function that you've never seen before. Someone may make a beautiful product, someone else may make a powerful product, but Apple balances the two and gives consumers an experience they've never had before. That was Steve's goal. It wasn't about being first, it was about being the best. If you couldn't give him your best, he didn't want you. He expected nothing less than perfection and drove his teams hard to get it. It was about taking others' poorly executed plans and showing them how it should have been done. He wanted a product that could be used by everyone, from less fortunate to politicians, the disabled and the independent.

There's so much about Steve Jobs that most people don't know or wouldn't recognize from his jean and turtleneck appearance. He was a vegan hippie Budhist rock star. He attributed his "out of the box" thinking to dropping acid and fought criticism with high brow sarcasm. Following an very premature obituary release in 2008, Steve opened his fall keynote with the Twain quote: "Reports of my death are greatly exaggerated." When he formally introduced the iPhone 4 in 2010, even though Gizmodo had thoroughly scooped the device early, he told the audience to stop him if they had seen it before.

What amazes me about him was that he was a magnificent hyporcite. Steve was a mad man. He challenged authority and became the single unchallenged authority. He broke the rules and made rules that could not be broken. He competed with the slogan "Think Different", yet cultimated the mentality of Apple addiction. He would claim that Apple would never make something, then make it. He commanded an unparalleled respect from the public. He controlled his public image and created the hype that Apple is famous for. He was Apple. No company founder or CEO will ever be revered as much as him. The impact on the news circuits was immeasurable.

Steve knew his time was coming to an end and put all his ducks in a row before he left Apple. He was a master strategist who saw a much bigger game board than anyone else. I have no doubt that many of the products in Apple's near future will still have Steve's fingerprint on them. A light that burns twice as bringht burns half as long, and you have burned so very, very brightly, Steve.

Sent from my iMac

Engadget

This Is My Next / The Verge

And gdgt is coming out of retirement to cover this event!

As a casual Apple user (I have an iPhone and iPad, but haven't traditionally used Macs or any other Apple products), I had this preconceived notion that Apple was watching out for me. With their well-publicized tight controls on the apps, I assumed they would be watching the books like a hawk, too. That really was naive. How would Apple be able to monitor these books, which are written in an open platform? It's not at all like controlling their apps, which are written on Apple's closed platform. Besides, we all know that some undesirable apps have slipped through. It's just that it was so shocking to me to find such a blatant example in my face. What's worse in my mind is that there isn't a clear way for me to escalate this and notify Apple. I did post the issue on the official Apple iBooks support forum, as well as wrote a review to make the problem clear.

Those of you who know me probably know that I've had a long-time interest in remote controlled vehicles. When I was young (<10) I can remember driving a RC boat in my grandparent's pool. When I got a bit older, I had a Tamaya Grasshopper car and later the Midnight Pumpkin pickup. My interest waned as I got into high school and other things competed with my time, but I returned to the hobby a few years ago when I picked up a gas-powered nitro truck. I sold that when we had our children.

Now enter the AR.Drone from Parrot. I've been following the development of this device for over a year. I believe I first heard about it at CES in 2009. If you haven't seen it, it is a $300 RC quadricopter (helicopter with four propellers). All four props are horizontal, meaning they blow air down only. The blades are in matched pairs (front left and back right are the same, front right and back left are the same), and the on-board controller handles the duties of alternating speed of each prop to respond to your controls. Speaking of controls, you use your iPhone (iPod touch and iPad work, but I find the iPad is too large). The copter uses on-screen controls and sends video back to your phone. Since you can find most of the specs and control methods easily online, I'll focus most of the rest of this on giving my opinion of the device.

First thing to know is don't believe the marketing stuff. I think most readers of this site are more savvy than that, anyway, but you may see lots of information and videos from Parrot showing how easy it is to control. I even found one of a 20-something man in what looked like a dorm room or apartment (small, 10'x10' space) with associated clutter fly it around without issue. I don't believe the video is fake at all, but you have to understand that the person flying the drone in the video has hours and hours of practice, and the room is setup in just the right way.

The videos show people flying over nicely mowed, flat green fields. Unfortunately, places like that are very scarce where I live. We have rolling hills, rural orchards and pasture-lands. The first time I flew the drone, I took it out to a nearby pasture. It was the best open space I could find. I must say that it was...interesting. I immediately noticed that the copter had some issues maintaining altitude. Not that it wouldn't stay off the ground, but just the opposite - it was too high off the ground! There was supposed to be an altitude limiter on it to keep it from going over about 10 feet high or so. My drone easily went up 20+ feet. Fortunately, the automatic landing feature worked great. There's a button on the controller that you press and the copter will automatically land itself (in theory). After I burned through two batteries (I bought a spare at the store) I had successfully landed it probably 2-3 times and at least a dozen times were crashes. Either it hit a tree and fell over, or a rotor got caught on something and flipped it, or I couldn't find a flat clear place. What I'm saying is it takes time to learn.

Fortunately, I have a relative who actually owns an aircraft hanger and it happened the night I bought it we were having dinner at his house. I brought the drone with me and we had a blast. One thing I picked up from the videos is that a hanger is the ideal place to learn to fly the drone. And that is a fact, Jack! No wind, large flat open space, etc. I had seven family members in their for an audience. Everything went perfectly. It was like night-and-day difference from the pasture. I had people walk under it to feel the breeze (and it is quite strong) and I flew it all around the hanger (probably 100' Long X 25' Wide X 25' High) without incident. After that great experience, I went back outside with it the next day and felt much more confident. I flew it around our backyard, front yard, even over the roof of our house. But it still takes practice. I've probably had nearly 90 minutes of flight time so far and have a ways to go.

One of the things I've enjoyed best is seeing the improvements Parrot has made over time. Their SDK is on v1.5 now and some of the improvements include improved frame rates, better controls, more control options, etc. And right along with Parrot's improvements, the third-party apps have improved. Currently, I am alternating between the official Parrot app, Freeflight (it's free), and a third-party app called Drone Control, which is $2.99. What's special about Drone Control is that it allows you to record screenshots and video from the drone. Whatever you see on the screen of your iPhone is recorded. Then you can transfer those files to the iPhone's camera roll for editing or transfer to your computer. The only issue I have with it is more of a moral one - I could in theory use this device to spy on someone. More specifically, I could easily look into a neighbor's fenced yard or second story window. I'm not overly concerned about it, but it could be an issue "in the wrong hands."

A couple more observations:

1. The issue I experienced with the drone's altitude was in fact a bug. It was specific to tall grass (as in a pasture).
2. The marketing suggests you can fly the drone based on the video feed from the iPhone. I haven't found the feed to be consistent enough, although Parrot has improved it over subsequent SDK releases.
3. This device is tough. I've banged that thing around a lot. One time I dropped it through the branches of a 30' tall pine tree (see picture below). All that happened was a small metal pin got bent. Parrot sells replacement parts for basically everything, and it only cost $10 for four pins with gears in a package. Easy, inexpensive repair.

In summary, I think the device is amazing for $300. I don't buy their marketing messages, but who does? It takes some learning, and the right conditions to get used to it. If you already have an iPhone or iPod Touch, and an interest in RC aircraft, then I think this is a wonderful device. I've been very careful not to call it a toy as I've seen in other reviews - it is too pricey, sophisticated, and complicated to be a toy. My recommendation is to pickup at least one spare battery, and I thought about a second. Also consider getting a package of spare propellers for $7 and the metal pins with gears for $10. That way you'll have them ready and they don't cost much. It's better than being down for 5 days while you wait for the new ones to ship to you.

Here are two parting shots taken from my drone using the Drone Control app. The first one is the neighborhood near the pasture where I was learning to fly.

The second shot is about 15 seconds before my drone went through that 30' pine tree and bent a pin. I think you can tell from these shots that the drone can get up pretty high.

While shopping, we noticed a trend to include a dedicated numeric keypad as part of the laptop keyboard. I would imagine this is due to the form factor of widescreen LCDs in newer laptops. In any case, we got the laptop from Amazon (model # NV5936u) and my wife loved the look, feel, and performance. There was an issue with the WiFi receiver (more on that in a future article, perhaps). But the numeric keypad - I mean, I get it that numpads are useful. They have a purpose when working with financial data and numbers, but my issue is how it changes my interface to the computer. After two weeks, neither my wife nor I got used to the off-set alignment of the regular keys. Her old HP and my existing laptop don't have numpads and what they did is slightly move the rest of the keys over to the left in order to support the addition of the extra keys. Eventually, we returned the Gateway (due to the WiFi issue I mentioned above, not the keyboard).

We went back looking for another laptop and decided on an HP G62-144DX. No numpad. Lighter weight. My wife likes this one even more (she's not picky). However, even thought there isn't a numpad, HP added five buttons along the left side, below ESC. These keys act as hotkeys for email, DVD playback, opening the internet browser, printing, and accessing the calculator. Aside from the dubiousness of someone else deciding what five functions I want hotkeys for, it also happens that these keys are in such a position that it fouls up my ability to type. I am a touch typist, and as such, I use the keyboard by feel alone. The fact that there are extra keys to the left of the ones I use, like Ctrl and Tab, means I hit a wrong key at least once every 10-30 minutes. It doesn't happen so much while I'm actively typing an article like this because my fingers tend to stay exactly on the home keys, but when I am browsing the web, I will accidentally bring up the DVD program or the calculator quite often. It's a pain.

So my question is why are computer makers doing this? I think in large part it is simply the old clichéd answer: Because they can. As laptops have become so much of a commodity, I think it gives them a way to differentiate theirs from the competition. I also think that since the netbook segment was created, manufacturers are looking for more ways to separate a full-sized laptop from a netbook. By having hotkeys and numpads, it gives manufacturers more check boxes for their marketing crap. It helps them justify the price difference between a netbook and a laptop in a physical way that consumers can actually see, as compared to just differences in specs that most people don't care about. The problem is it messes up the fundamental way I interact with a computer.

Now if you read my rant to this point, you might think I don't like innovation, or I'm averse to making changes (even ones that might improve the ultimate user experience). I say nay. Here is what I would propose: First, don't worry about a dedicated numpad. At least not with anything under 17". We're talking about a laptop, after all, and I know many people use one as their primary computer (so do I), but if one needs to work on spreadsheets, financial documents, etc., then one probably has the ability to use an external keyboard and numpad. I know several nice wireless numpads that are portable and can easily be used alongside a standard keyboard (including one in a laptop). Second, if you're going to give me hotkeys, at least make them programmable. I'm pretty sure there's a way to reassign them, but the point is HP should have included an easy way to do it. Third, the hotkeys should be up top. There's plenty of room, especially with widescreen format, to include extra buttons along the top. They even look cool - the smooth capacitive bars with LEDs under them for things like mute, WiFi, etc. Use that space for your marketing buttons. Bottom line, until some other primary interface is developed, don't mess with my keyboard!



Long story short, it's the color of the bra they're wearing. It's a clever way to promote awareness of breast cancer, apparently originating from the Ann Arbor area. No definite explanation, just another mysterious chain-letter effect that will most likely vanish as quickly as it appeared.

What these clever ladies probably didn't consider is that they're flaunting the fact that they wear bras, bras that mastectomy patients probably don't need anymore. See, a common effect of having breast cancer is a mastectomy, or surgical removal of the breasts. In other words, these ladies, most of whom I'm sure have wonderful pairs of gravity defying sweater puppies, are flaunting their good health, all in the name of awareness for those less fortunate than them. Seems like a backwards way to spread awareness of breast cancer to me.

See, memes are a tricky thing. For one, the instructions directed women to send others private messages with the details, but just publish the appropriate color.

"Something fun is going on," the message reads. "Write the color of your bra in your status. Just the color, nothing else. And send this on to ONLY women no men. It will be neat to see if this will spread the wings of cancer awareness. It will be fun to see how long it takes before the men wonder why the women have a color in their status.....LOL!"

Of course, the burning question is why I would care, one of the most heartless (we don't have an awareness month for that) people in the world short of Dick Cheney. Two simple reasons. My grandma is a survivor and mastectomy recepient. I don't think she keeps up with social networking and memes, but I have trouble believing that she'd feel supported by this demonstration. It doesn't help her, nor does it help any other breast cancer survivor. Come to think of it, Breast Cancer Awareness month... is October! Please, let's keep these awareness months in the right spot, lest we start observing Testicular Cancer Awareness month in... whenever that is (BTW, Prostate Cancer Awareness is September). Also, I believe that supporting awareness of only one type of cancer is preposterous. Cancer should be battled evenly and with equal effort. Men support awareness of breast cancer by volunteering impromptu screenings, even with little expectation for reciprocation. That said, women should leave Internet secrets to men, the ones who created them. We know how to keep things hidden online much longer (many women would do well to learn a lesson). Just give up on the meme business and stop trying to tease us with your bras. We've seen them and would rather see you without them.

Mint.com is a website that will track your bank accounts, credit cards and other expenditures and graph them for your planning needs. This is where people get concerned.

"But, but, my bank information! I don't want anyone to have it! Is this site safe?"

Yes, of course it is. You don't actually provide the site with your bank information, just the login credentials to the bank's website. Even from most bank sites, you can't actually do much in the way of moving money, it's just an electronic check book. However, most people (including myself now, I'm a big boy!) have accounts and cards with multiple banking establishments. Mint will aggregate your information with all of them and provide you with a singular outlook on your income and spending.

Now why would anyone need that kind of reminder of how much they spend? It's simple. It's a visual checkbook that breaks down spending and income by categories and specific vendors. You can create rules that say certain transactions are certain categories, and fit them into your budget, while having a graph show how much of your budget you're using.

The biggest concern people are having is privacy. If it's a free service, how do they make money without just selling your data? The advertising is available through the optional links that show you how to save money or other types of investments. But it's all optional. If you don't want to look into types of investment, you won't see anything resembling an ad. Even with that, Mint has recently solved its own financial needs. Mint was purchased by Intuit, the makers of the Quicken software that many use to plan their taxes. Intuit already has an online Quicken service similar to Mint, but it seems that it favors the new service instead. Current users of Quicken Online will be migrated over to Mint, with no real change to the service in the near future. That said, the security that Mint uses is the same as other online banking, now with the credibility of a software company that many give their financial information to, anyway.

So there you have it. A free online financial service that visualizes your budgets, with just as much security as the online banking you already do, owned by a software company that millions already use. There's nothing to be afraid of, so you might as well try it out. If you don't believe me, check out Lifehacker's final review of it.

Drobo (Data Robotics) is a computer-independent RAID-in-a-box that has 4 2.5" SATA drive bays. It supports the use of 4x4TB drives, even though the current maximum is 2TB in a drive. Even so, 4x2TB (after the RAID math) gives you 5.5TB of usable "protected" space. Should a drive fail or the full volume require the smallest drive to be replaced with a larger one, the drive can be hot-swapped with a replacement and the volume will immediately begin to rebuild, with all the data still available. Rebuild time varies with volume size and how much data is actually on it, but it's still pretty impressive to know that

The box even has a small battery to finish write cycles, so a power outage won't kill the device before it has a chance to close a write. Not finishing a write cycle can leave your volume open and irretreivable when you power back on and is the most common failure effect from a power outage. It connects via USB to a single computer and mounts as a normal external hard drive. You set up the Drobo to be a certain maximum size, which is reported in the OS, regardless of how much physical space is currently available from the drives. To manage the device, use the Drobo Dashboard software, which doesn't do much, but it does accurately report usage and rebuild time.

The DroboPro is essentially the same, except it has 8 bays (supporting up to 8x4GB drives) and allowing for single-drive and dual-drive failure (which decreases the usable space). The integrated iSCSI-compatible network card replaces the DroboShare, but makes the overall product reach three times the cost of the Drobo, even with just twice the capacity. It's a much more expensive solution for serious enterprise use, but if it's just as useful as the Drobo, it's probably worth it.

You can pick up an empty Drobo off Amazon for pretty cheap, but for those looking for something in between, Drobo just recently announced two new products, the 5-bay Drobo S and 8-bay dual-ethernet DroboElite. They may seem expensive, especially compared to consumer NAS products, but these are truly all you need.

The cause? Between the phone's manufacturer and its recent owner, it's looking like a failure to accurately organize data infrastructure and identify possible points of failure in case of an emergency. After all, the whole fiasco affected all of 10 people. Some accusations are even pointing to some form of data sabotoge from the inside. Regardless, that didn't stop users from blaming the people they pay (T-Mobile) and filing a class action lawsuit. From left field, mobile device maker Peek offered their product to Sidekick owners for free as a way to get them off T-Mobile (even though you pay for the Peek service).

Within hours, users were reporting that their phones' data was gone, including contacts, messages and apps. All major blogs were talking about it, making obligatory 'Danger' references. After the fun was had at MS's expense, a small number of users were reporting that their data was returning. That's good, I guess, not that anyone was hoping to use this as an excuse to get an actual smartphone. Merely days later, Microsoft announced that "most, if not all" data had been restored to all devices. That's a pretty dramatic change from the earlier "all your data is gone" status. The reasoning behind MS's determination to restore service lies in the SLA that it acquired when it acquired Danger. Danger has a 99.5% uptime SLA with T-Mobile, and should uptime fall below that, the penalty is $700,000/day in T-Mobile's favor. That hefty fine certainly answers how T-Mobile was able to 'apologize' to its users by not only crediting them for a month of service, but also giving them a $100 'customer appreciation card' to be used however they wish with T-Mobile. How is this affected by the fact that people are getting their data back? Maybe they won't get that apology from T-Mobile after all, and maybe that class action suit won't fly in court. Only time will tell, but in the mean time, the rest of the world will be using modern phones.